5 ms·
For as long as we make intelligent algorithms, people will continue moving the goalposts by changing the definitions of intelligence. We have an algorithm that
by Iv 5y ago
For as long as we make intelligent algorithms, people will continue moving the goalposts by changing the definitions of intelligence.
We have an algorithm that can learn to outperform humans at any deterministic game and learn the rules by simply watching it. We have algorithms that outperform humans at image recognition and OCR. We have algorithm that draw images according to descriptions. We have algorithms that decipher languages just by looking at a corpus of text.
But somehow, as soon as a computer can do it, it is not considered an intelligent task anymore. Kasparov or Champollion used to be considered very smart for what they did, but now apparently that's just considered dumb applied statistics.