But the point he actually wanted to convey was: * Christopher Alexanders design patterns are a valuable concept which might benefit computer programming. * Bu

But the point he actually wanted to convey was: * Christopher Alexanders design patterns are a valuable concept which might benefit computer programming. * But GoF patterns sucks and has nothing to do with Alexanders patterns Too bad he doesn't provide any kind of example of how Alexander-type patterns could be applied to programming. Otherwise it might have been a quite interesting presentation.