3 ms·
If one of the bystanders cares enough, they'll use their phone to take a picture of you. From there it's entirely possible to link that picture of you to other
by sorbus 15y ago
If one of the bystanders cares enough, they'll use their phone to take a picture of you. From there it's entirely possible to link that picture of you to other pictures of you online (facial recognition and all that), and then to your identity, if there are any publicly accessible pictures of you online that are linked to your identity. Or they could share it with their social network, hoping that there's some overlap.
Similarly, if I hear someone shout something that interests me, I can begin a conversation with them which may lead to getting details of their identity, unless they're actively concealing those details. Or follow them home, and so forth, as you start moving to less and less ethical options.
Attaching real names to statements online does make the process ridiculously easy, though, and it would probably be useful if social networks had a "do not expose my identity (in comments, etc.) to people who are not already my friends (or friends of friends)." That seems (to me, at least) to be rather more similar to how the real world works.
- shabble 15y agoThe absolutely massive photo database owned (or at least permanent irrevocably licensed access and storage) by Facebook, combined with the metadata people are more than happy to provide (Tagging their friends bodies & faces) sounds like an absolutely perfect training set for an automated recognition system. You'll even get all sorts of different angles, lighting conditions, age variations, and just about anything else you might want. I'm not usually one for conspiracy theories, but there's something about it that makes me at least a little uneasy.
- sorbus 15y agoFacebook apparently already has a facial recognition system, which startles me a bit. Not surprising in the least, of course, just I'm worried that I hadn't heard of it before.