3 ms·
Have you heard of the Arian heresy [1]? It was THE major debate in the early church and it was centered on whether Jesus and god were the same substance (Homoou
by dr_dshiv 5y ago
Have you heard of the Arian heresy [1]? It was THE major debate in the early church and it was centered on whether Jesus and god were the same substance (Homoousia) or somehow on a different level (as advocated by Arius). The Nicene Creed (325 AD) established homoousia as a necessary principle on being Christian. This was very political — the emperor Constantine got personally involved.
So, in the context of this recent event, imagine Jerome translating the lord's prayer and dealing with a word that appears to imply multiple levels of substance. Rather than encouraging more heresies, he used a colloquial translation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arian_controversy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arian_controversy
- aidenn0 5y agoExcept Jerome coined the latin word "supersubstantial" to translate this and considered, but rejected, the alternative translation of "for the future" that could have completely avoided bringing substance into it at all.
- dr_dshiv 5y agoAh, true. He used quotidianum in Matthew and supersubstantialem in Luke. If you ask me, he was hedging his bets between church and god. But, "give us this day our supernatural bread"... just doesn't have the same ring to it, you know?