> Recent advancements in AI made me wonder whether human intelligence is little more than a "stochastic parrot" with a large enough training set. If I dig down

> Recent advancements in AI made me wonder whether human intelligence is little more than a "stochastic parrot" with a large enough training set. If I dig down far enough, almost any knowledge could be learned and understood that way. People don't get obviously counter-productive results like "I think you should" (kill yourself) from human intelligence, though. As long as this simple stochastic text-regurgitators do that, I think it's an insult to intelligence to call them "intelligence". Idunno, I think "intelligence" has (at least to me) very strong connotations of common sense. (Yeay, yeah, I know: Not so common at all, unfortunately, heh heh heh.) These models don't seem to have any of that at all.