4 ms·

[citation needed] who those serious historians are supposed to be.

• ncmncm 5y ago
  Please allow me to direct you to an active, ongoing history of refereed journals, academic chairs, and professional study which you may even see discussed at great length on Youtube, such as is cited in a sibling reply.
  • objectivetruth 5y ago
    Most of us don't find "just watch this YouTube URL, it explains everything" to be a helpful reply from an interlocutor. I can't ignore the fact that it is a very common tactic of conspiracy theorists of various stripes, poor deluded QAnon believers, and drinkers of ivermectin. I gave you the benefit of the doubt and it's a 10-year-old recording of a nearly-hourlong lecture by a single scholar. I'm not watching that. You implied there is a significant number of professional ("serious") historians that don't believe in the historicity of Jesus in 2021 and I just don't see how this video supports that.
  • bhaak 5y ago
    I'm not sure how "New Evidences the Gospels were Based on Eyewitness Accounts" would support your claim "whether Jesus, Matthew, Luke, et al ever even existed" and that Christianity started out as Roman cult.