I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought this! It's like someone wrote the article designed solely to test bias confirmation. At the end of the article, I stil

I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought this! It's like someone wrote the article designed solely to test bias confirmation. At the end of the article, I still don't know what apple lost, or what the author thinks that apple will have lost (other than "the war"). It didn't tell me what apple did win - other than "exactly what everyone knew they would win" - gee, thanks for that one. I can't see what people are downvoting on this comment. Basically, you cannot read that article without any bias on this topic and expect to have learned something new. Maybe if I followed all the links in it, that might explain the situation - but the links are: - a series of tubes - [the next battle of] Apple v. Epic. - just maybe - they need to say - given the Japanese settlement - continues - real reforms to the App Store - they’re a lot smarter ... etc. There is absolutely no context to this non-article, and no hints where to go to get the context. Sorry. I usually try not to rant about the content that people put on the internet, but please HN community - you're usually much better at filtering the bull than this.