Since it's not immediately obvious what the issue is since it's in the "reception" section > The peer review process employed by the journal has been criticize

Since it's not immediately obvious what the issue is since it's in the "reception" section > The peer review process employed by the journal has been criticized by Jeffrey Beall, a university librarian and expert on predatory open access publishing, who also included the journal and its publisher on his list of "potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access journals" in July 2015.