4 ms·

What a non-article... Two points: - "the judge’s order to stop App Store anti-steering is a big one" - "bad vibes yielding bad blood within Apple’s own devel

• undecisive 5y ago
  I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought this! It's like someone wrote the article designed solely to test bias confirmation. At the end of the article, I still don't know what apple lost, or what the author thinks that apple will have lost (other than "the war"). It didn't tell me what apple did win - other than "exactly what everyone knew they would win" - gee, thanks for that one. I can't see what people are downvoting on this comment. Basically, you cannot read that article without any bias on this topic and expect to have learned something new. Maybe if I followed all the links in it, that might explain the situation - but the links are: - a series of tubes - [the next battle of] Apple v. Epic. - just maybe - they need to say - given the Japanese settlement - continues - real reforms to the App Store - they’re a lot smarter ... etc. There is absolutely no context to this non-article, and no hints where to go to get the context. Sorry. I usually try not to rant about the content that people put on the internet, but please HN community - you're usually much better at filtering the bull than this.
  • jevgeni 5y ago
    As someone who claims to be a writer, the author really should know better and not publish such low-value posts. Your point with the links makes it even clearer.
• stavros 5y ago
  I don't know why people are downvoting this (without providing a rebuttal, no less), I agree.
  • jevgeni 5y ago
    Eh... People get emotional about their pre-established opinions. :D