Just because you can't rely on the compiler to tell you, doesn't mean memory errors exist. There's this weird idea Rust programmers have that since C++ doesn't

Just because you can't rely on the compiler to tell you, doesn't mean memory errors exist. There's this weird idea Rust programmers have that since C++ doesn't force you to write less performant code by bowing down to a borrow checker that isn't smart enough to handle e.g. single threaded futures and locking properly, that it is IMPOSSIBLE to write memory safe C++ code. A piece of code without memory errors is, by definition, memory safe. This whole idea of "every piece of code has bugs" is some new-wave tripe coming out of code camps and the web development scene.