6 ms·
What was linked in a later comment was the injuncture by the court related to the changing of apple's rules in the app store, not a direct ruling by the court r
by vineyardmike 5y ago
What was linked in a later comment was the injuncture by the court related to the changing of apple's rules in the app store, not a direct ruling by the court related to who "won" the apple v epic trial. I won't copy the full Remedies from the 185 page document, but simply the part that you were asking about.
> G. Remedies
> The relief to which Apple is entitled is that to which Epic Games stipulated in the event
that the Court found it liable for breach of contract, namely:
> (1) damages in an amount equal to (i) 30% of the $12,167,719 in revenue Epic Games
collected from users in the Fortnite app on iOS through Epic Direct Payment between August
and October 2020, plus (ii) 30% of any such revenue Epic Games collected from November 1,
2020 through the date of judgment; and
> (2) a declaration that (i) Apple’s termination of the DPLA and the related agreements
between Epic Games and Apple was valid, lawful, and enforceable, and (ii) Apple has the
contractual right to terminate its DPLA with any or all of Epic Games’ wholly owned
subsidiaries, affiliates, and/or other entities under Epic Games’ control at any time and at
Apple’s sole discretion.
Source:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21060631-apple-epic-judgement https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21060631-apple-epic-...
page 180
- ksec 5y agoWhat you just replied is exactly what I wrote. EPIC lost and require to paid what they own. Not they have to paid 30% via another payment.