10 ms·
Forget WiFi, It's LiFi: Internet Through Lightbulbs
- alok-g 15y agoThis is not a new idea. Saw a functional demo more than eight years back. Checkout: http://www.talking-lights.com/ http://www.talking-lights.com/
- isTravis 15y agoCompletely correct. This is not a new idea at all. However TalkingLights had a huge bandwidth limit because they used flourescent lighting. LEDs can go to much higher speeds - but even still, this isn't new. Researchers in Japan and Boston University have been producing demos for years: http://www.bu.edu/smartlighting/research/smart-light-prototype/ http://www.bu.edu/smartlighting/research/smart-light-prototy... http://www.naka-lab.jp/index_e.html http://www.naka-lab.jp/index_e.html
- cma 15y agoMuch much older than that: http://www.alge.no/ebooks/Optical_tempest.pdf http://www.alge.no/ebooks/Optical_tempest.pdf This technique was used in at least the early 90s
- narkee 15y ago>And security would be a snap—if you can’t see the light, you can’t access the data. That doesn't make any sense at all. People don't intercept data transmission with their eyes. If your computer or device can "see" the light, so can mine.
- aptsurdist 15y agoI think the point of that statement was just that the data isn't transmitted through walls.
- reustle 15y agoI think the point is with, say, wifi, it is broadcasted in all directions, where LiFi would be pointed directly at the destination, which makes it much harder to intercept.
- creativeone 15y agoAnyway to see this in action?
- asmithmd1 15y agoHere is a link to his TED talk http://blog.ted.com/2011/08/02/wireless-data-from-every-light-bulb-harald-haas-on-ted-com/ http://blog.ted.com/2011/08/02/wireless-data-from-every-ligh... It seems like a good idea but he does not address how to get the data to each light fixture
- dpryan 15y agoThis is an open problem. The dream scenario is to utilize power line communications, but that technology has its own set of issues.
- watmough 15y agoI already use Ethernet over household wiring to get data from the uverse router to my wife's office. I think it's 200 Mbs, but whatever, it's completely transparent to use. It may be the only completely foolproof piece of hardware in the house.
- akmiller 15y agoI like to work in the dark.
- Afton 15y agoHow do you avoid interference between devices? Is this meant for receiver-only, or bidirectional transfer? (he says bidirectional in the ted talk, but only talks about phones using their cameras to receive). Seems a little like a technology in search of a problem.
- noamsml 15y agoYou could always use radio waves for the upload band. That way, it will still increase both download and upload speeds (uploads will can have a wider band now that they don't compete with downloads for the same airspace), it just won't increase upload speeds as much.
- isTravis 15y agoThis is the right idea for sure. Data usage is almost always asymmetric - people download much more than they upload. So let's widen the download channel using visible light and still use the sufficiently large RF channel for the up stream.
- lgeek 15y agoYou avoid interference in the same way you avoid it for radio wave communication: multiplexing. It could be time-based (time slots for each sender), frequency-based (different colors) or code-based (look up CDMA). Plus, you already have 'spatial multiplexing' because light doesn't pass through walls as opposed to RF.
- Geee 15y agoIt's OFDM based transmission so OFDMA would be trivial to implement on this. Like on Wi-fi.
- alex_c 15y agoDuplicate discussion here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2850288 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2850288
- dpryan 15y agoFraunhofer recently demonstrated 800 Mbps through visible light as well. http://www.fraunhofer.de/en/press/research-news/2010-2011/20/data-traveling.jsp http://www.fraunhofer.de/en/press/research-news/2010-2011/20...
- zwieback 15y agoKind of a cool idea - take IrDA to the next level. Probably no issue with FCC regulations since the visible spectrum is kind of a free-for-all.
- dpryan 15y agoIt's also convenient in that it takes advantage of the existing infrastructure if you're performing the communication with general purpose LED lamps, which are being rapidly adopted for their energy efficiency.
- simcop2387 15y agoI think the coolest part of this would be if someone were to take it and combine it with a "standard" (I really don't know how standard it is) Powerline ethernet setup. Would make for a more reliable than wifi setup in some buildings while being easily compatible with existing hardware.
- NHQ 15y agoThat might be the best argument going for it. Which is not to dismiss the rest of the device's potential. Suck that one FCCT&T!
- chrisbennett 15y agoSaw this in the university research lab where it was developed about a year ago while touring new tech in Germany. Very cool to see that it's still moving forward.
- andrewcross 15y agoThis blew my mind. It makes sense that light will be more controllable (think lamps projecting photos onto a wall), but the light itself being an internet source is trippy.
- Cushman 15y agoWhat have you been imagining WiFi is all these years?
- fla 15y agoDoes it means every light source is connected to a network cable ? If so, where is the security ? All it takes is to find a network cable and intercept the traffic. And there will be thousands of network cables in every building (at least as many as power cables). For me 'security' sounds like false advertising, in practice.
- dcheng 15y agoI really hope they don't use this to autopilot cars. That seems completely reckless. If a terrorist happened to get an LED flashlight that disrupted the transmission of whatever light signals were going to the autopiloted cars, there would be chaos. It would be so easy interrupt these signals. Thinking more about it, any signal "controlling" an autopiloted car would be insecure and be an easy exploit that any malicious-minded people could take advantage of. But that's a discussion that's besides the point.
- dcheng 15y agowhy the downvotes?
- tlianza 15y agoGives new meaning to a programmer "going dark." Well, same meaning I guess. Only literal.
- scotty79 15y agoCould you just solder LED and phototransistor to a proper place in you wifi cards and achieve same goal?