"obvious straw man" researchers should be worrying about the non-obvious strawmen. Because these extreme conditions help up check the boundaries of what is poss

"obvious straw man" researchers should be worrying about the non-obvious strawmen. Because these extreme conditions help up check the boundaries of what is possible to verify or not. > The problem is that there are plenty of research questions where RCTs show us that previous non-RCTs were wrong. And that is fine. When you are able to use an RCT.