I agree, and I think the prevailing climate would have to change first. However I don't see anything that would make such a law fundamentally and obviously unco

I agree, and I think the prevailing climate would have to change first. However I don't see anything that would make such a law fundamentally and obviously unconstitutional. The case I could make is that it may prevent the child's right to future free exercise of a religion in which the, uh, package should be, err, OEM.