4 ms·
No, it's because they are fucking wackjobs. That's a fact. It's not an accusation. And it's not because of any bullshit about "who they are accused of being"; i
by Bud 5y ago
No, it's because they are fucking wackjobs. That's a fact. It's not an accusation. And it's not because of any bullshit about "who they are accused of being"; it's because of their wackjob argument.
They are promoting a conspiracy theory that the WTC was destroyed by a controlled demolition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architects_%26_Engineers_for_9/11_Truth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architects_%26_Engineers_for_9...
- hsousa 5y agoHow is that not an accusation?
- Lammy 5y agoYeah I think we should believe the unbiased explanation and give a $7-billion no-bid contract to the Vice President's private military contracting firm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7444083.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7444083.stm
- knownjorbist 5y agoInstead of vagaries, actually connect the dots. The outcome of 9/11 in terms of the gov't seizing the opportunity was going to happen either way - you need a better argument than "look what happened after".
- Bud 5y agoThis kind of feverish laziness and total disregard for intellectual rigor is, of course, precisely what allows the wackiest conspiracy theories to spread.
- swader999 5y agoHow about building 7?