It seems that the decision to fire him was completely unjustified: > APRS had requested that its employees be fingerprinted as a result of a background check r

It seems that the decision to fire him was completely unjustified: > APRS had requested that its employees be fingerprinted as a result of a background check requirement of one of its clients > APRS terminated Harrington [...] without asking the client whether an exemption was available [...] even though alternatives to fingerprinting were available.