5 ms·

Poll is irrelevant. Tech workers should get vaccinated regardless of an mandates. And they should lobby their company to install a vaccine mandate if they're un

Poll is irrelevant. Tech workers should get vaccinated regardless of an mandates. And they should lobby their company to install a vaccine mandate if they're under 100 employees (the federal/OSHA mandate will handle 100 or over). There is no reason whatsoever to not get vaccinated except under very very very limited circumstances and those folks should be working from home.

paulddraper 5y ago
> There is no reason whatsoever Said in the forum where half of it boycotts Google because they don't like something or other it's done. If you think Google has done something boycott-worthy, oh boy will you be interested in drug manufacturers.
Wowfunhappy 5y ago
I agree†, but the poll is still interesting. † Although I think under those limited circumstances, the affected should be able to make their own choices about what is important to them in life, since they are the ones most at risk anyway.
swiley 5y ago
We’re all remote you absolute retard.
criticaltinker 5y ago
> here is no reason whatsoever to not get vaccinated except under very very very limited circumstances Do those limited circumstances include: 1) individuals with immunity acquired through previous infection? 2) the need to prioritize other individuals who have not been vaccinated once already? 3) vaccine resistance - i.e. in populations with dominant variants that to continue to evolve substantial resistance to current formulations? 4) vulnerable sub-populations (ie children & pregnant women) that have not yet participated in any long-term or large-scale clinical trials?
goldforever 5y ago
I'll say it, "You're a dumbass".
version_five 5y ago
> There is no reason whatsoever to not get vaccinated except under very very very limited circumstances What does this statement have to do with mandating that one provides personal medical information as a condition of participation in society? Please don't pretend that agreeing with vaccination is the same as agreeing with invasion of privacy and government and employer overreach
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]

paulddraper 5y ago

> There is no reason whatsoever Said in the forum where half of it boycotts Google because they don't like something or other it's done. If you think Google has done something boycott-worthy, oh boy will you be interested in drug manufacturers.

Wowfunhappy 5y ago

I agree†, but the poll is still interesting. † Although I think under those limited circumstances, the affected should be able to make their own choices about what is important to them in life, since they are the ones most at risk anyway.

swiley 5y ago

We’re all remote you absolute retard.

criticaltinker 5y ago

> here is no reason whatsoever to not get vaccinated except under very very very limited circumstances Do those limited circumstances include: 1) individuals with immunity acquired through previous infection? 2) the need to prioritize other individuals who have not been vaccinated once already? 3) vaccine resistance - i.e. in populations with dominant variants that to continue to evolve substantial resistance to current formulations? 4) vulnerable sub-populations (ie children & pregnant women) that have not yet participated in any long-term or large-scale clinical trials?

goldforever 5y ago

I'll say it, "You're a dumbass".

version_five 5y ago

> There is no reason whatsoever to not get vaccinated except under very very very limited circumstances What does this statement have to do with mandating that one provides personal medical information as a condition of participation in society? Please don't pretend that agreeing with vaccination is the same as agreeing with invasion of privacy and government and employer overreach

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]