3 ms·
I'll be honest and say I don't like this trend in UX. The article is right that they are merely following others, so I won't lay this on them as their fault, bu
by noobermin 5y ago
I'll be honest and say I don't like this trend in UX. The article is right that they are merely following others, so I won't lay this on them as their fault, but it feels like making icons buttons look less like buttons is reversing a trend a lot of people are used to, as well as reducing contrast for older users and disabled folks. I think the most recent change that stuck in my mind was recent firefox's redesign.
I recall the GNOME team priding themselves on actually starting the original gnome 3 redesign based on studying usage patterns, and against the angry grain I was on their side and used gnome 3 for quite a few years. I have to wonder whether this design was passed by any accessibility folks or even studied, it seems like it is against that spirit of actually evaluating usage patterns.
- sneak 5y agoChoosing to follow a bad trend is indeed the fault of the bandwagon-jumper.
- noobermin 5y agoFair. When I said "it's not their fault" I meant more along the lines as they didn't come up with this ill-advised idea themselves, that others came up with it. They shouldn't have jumped aboard without considering accessibility and usable issues and for that may be they deserve criticism.