You snark, but the agenda of a new source such as NPR should be to objectively inform the public. That means, highlighting the risks of a breakthrough case suc

You snark, but the agenda of a new source such as NPR should be to objectively inform the public. That means, highlighting the risks of a breakthrough case such as the one in the article with the addition of probability of getting such a case, using data as a means of supporting their arguments about risks post-vaccination, etc. The entire article is written in a spooky manner, indirectly extrapolating a single anecdotal experience written in alarmist tone.