3 ms·
We have a representative democracy. Laws are passed. People make decisions for/or against a location based upon its laws. What is not to like about people ha
by smitty1e 5y ago
We have a representative democracy.
Laws are passed.
People make decisions for/or against a location based upon its laws.
What is not to like about people having choices?
(The law in question seeks to protect those truly lacking a choice in this context.)
- quantified 5y agoAll correct, though the progression from “a couple of cells” to “person” obviously has a lot of interpretation that will be different for different people. An interesting thing is that the law is, as I see it, allowing civil protection for being offended at another’s actions, since the citizen plaintiffs otherwise have no standing. Should SCOTUS uphold this mode that’s a messed-up principle that can be gamed by every legislature to create chaos in our courts. I also wonder if companies will simply put big centers in red and blue areas to allow employees to pick the place they’d rather be. In a remote-first era, HQ location matters less than it did.
- smitty1e 5y ago> All correct, though the progression from “a couple of cells” to “person” The count of cells, sure, but the DNA is as constant as anything in organic chemistry. The gaze aversion of the abortionistas from this invariant is stunning and bespeaks a need to reach a pre-conceived (heh) conclusion no matter the cost.
- ykevinator3 5y agoI smell jesus
- smitty1e 5y agoHe's worth knowing.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]