From another article[0]: >The email then laid out multiple conditions Rohrer would have to meet if he wanted to continue using the language model's API. First,

From another article[0]: >The email then laid out multiple conditions Rohrer would have to meet if he wanted to continue using the language model's API. First, he would have to scrap the ability for people to train their own open-ended chatbots, as per OpenAI's rules-of-use for GPT-3. >Second, he would also have to implement a content filter to stop Samantha from talking about sensitive topics. This is not too dissimilar from the situation with the GPT-3-powered AI Dungeon game, the developers of which were told by OpenAI to install a content filter after the software demonstrated a habit of acting out sexual encounters with not just fictional adults but also children. >Third, Rohrer would have to put in automated monitoring tools to snoop through people’s conversations to detect if they are misusing GPT-3 to generate unsavory or toxic language. [0] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/08/project_december_openai_gpt_3/ https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/08/project_december_open...