5 ms·
> Rates of cancers etc are higher near military bases due to fuel handling incidents. Avgas is only used in piston engines, and the military mostly flies turbi
by jrockway 5y ago
> Rates of cancers etc are higher near military bases due to fuel handling incidents.
Avgas is only used in piston engines, and the military mostly flies turbines, which use ordinary jet fuel (which does not contain lead). They have some, but I think if you told the military "jets and turboprops only" it wouldn't be a big problem. (Not sure how they would train new pilots, however.)
If you're looking for disease/damage from lead in avgas, you want to find a little airport in the middle of nowhere that has a really good restaurant on the field ;)
https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/avgas https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/avgas
> I am guessing it's still allowed because people who fly planes can afford to lobby.
People that fly piston engines do not have any money to lobby.
To me it feels very similar to why software engineers pay so much tax -- we get paid just enough to be dinged by things like the AMT, but not enough to afford lobbyists.
- dredmorbius 5y agoI find the T-53A, a trainer version of the Cirrus SR20, which is piston-engine propeller aircraft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_United_States_military_aircraft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_United_States_m... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cirrus_SR20 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cirrus_SR20 There might be some piston-based helicopters (too many to check), or drones. Otherwise, yes, bangers are out.
- R0b0t1 5y agoJet fuel is carcinogenic and causes other problems, I didn't say this was just about lead. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/973128/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/973128/ as an example.