3 ms·
> Perhaps the government should open companies [...] that are good for the people but bad for business? Perhaps the government should close companies that are
by pyrale 5y ago
> Perhaps the government should open companies [...] that are good for the people but bad for business?
Perhaps the government should close companies that are good for business but bad for the people instead.
In France after WW2, the companies that had participated in the German war effort, or to collaborate were simply confistated. When I see this kind of revelation, which show a complete breakage of corporate oversight and an evaporation of personal responsibility, I wonder whether the easiest solution may be to void existing stocks, have the government take over the board and re-auction the company once the management structure has been cleared.
- garavanting 5y ago>I wonder whether the easiest solution may be to void existing stocks, have the government take over the board and re-auction the company once the management structure has been cleared. That's precisely what Norway did in its own financial crisis: >In the last years of the 1980s, there was a major financial crisis in Norway and by 1991 the bank had used up all capital. To save the bank, the Government of Norway took over the bank and gave it new capital, rescuing it from bankruptcy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christiania_Bank https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christiania_Bank It's a good idea: the shareholders, who boast that their returns come from the risk they're taking, should bear that risk. If the business is too big to fail, well, then it should just be brought under government control when it would otherwise fail.