4 ms·

I remember reading as a kid that this is the kind of thing that an evil empire does. Now that I realize that evil empire is us, I don't understand how anyone ca

I remember reading as a kid that this is the kind of thing that an evil empire does. Now that I realize that evil empire is us, I don't understand how anyone can justify this horror show.

refurb 5y ago
I’m not sure I’d expect that enemy combatants could expect the same legal protections as someone who committed a crime in the US? I mean look at the Nuremberg trials. If there was ever an illusion of justice it was that trial. German citizens were convicted of “wars of aggression” against Poland while the USSR, who collaborated with the Nazis and committed war crimes against the Polish people, weren’t even on trial but rather judges.
- quantum_solanum 5y ago
  > enemy combatants this is literally the core fascist tautology that the article is critiquing, gotta love the uncritical regurgitation of it
  - refurb 5y ago
    Read up on international laws of war and get back to me. The US didn’t make that term up.
    - quantum_solanum 5y ago
      you missed the point, which is that many of the people in Gitmo _were not_ "enemy combatants"
      - refurb 5y ago
        Sorry I wasn't able to determine that was your statement from your comment on "core fascist tautology" which sounds like internet warrior speak.
lazide 5y ago
1) it is a certain, very visible symbol of a certain type of approach to ‘terrorism’ that a large portion of the US population supports very strongly (do you remember all the comments for years about ‘glass parking lot’ re: the Middle East? I do.) 2) it opened a massive can of worms legally, and a huge mess related to what to do with detainees (some of which have now lost their original national citizenships and/or normal lives), as they are now basically wards of the US gov’t, with no existing legal framework to cover what to do. It wouldn’t surprise me if when it does get shutdown many of them end up being Refugees the US ends up supporting. Good luck explaining THAT to the voters. So it’s a big legal and PR mess that there is little incentive to try to fix for any politician. Lots of downside, little upside.
mirekrusin 5y ago
Evil empire is the one that lost.
- hoseja 5y ago
  Alternatively, "empire" is synonymous with "evil" because a benign entity cannot be competitive enough to reach empire size.
  - kzrdude 5y ago
    I was pondering this when listening to stories of the fall of the Aztecs and the Inca empires (Fall of Civilizations podcast - some great hours-long stories there!). Officials from the Spanish empire came by and caused these meso- and south american empires to fall. The empires that fell were indeed already warmongering, and dominating their part of the continent due to fighting successful wars and/or alliances. In that sense, it was "only" an empire taking down another. That viewpoint is however just the politics of the history. We can't forget how it affected the people.
  - mirekrusin 5y ago
    You mean ie. Empire State Building can be referred to as Evil State Building?
- aqsalose 5y ago
  So, did the US win in Afganistan?
  - boomboomsubban 5y ago
    Our entire reason for invading Afghanistan was essentially to kill Bin Laden, so yes?
    - cannabis_sam 5y ago
      I mean, considering he was found in Pakistan, close to their security forces ( ostensibly allies of the US) while the US military was pumping literal trillions into trying to control the neighboring tribal country. All the while desperately (and until yesterday) denying the fact that the Saudis had anything to do with a terrorist attack concocted by a Saudi and executed by Saudis. I guess it’s a win, but in that case I think the entire concept of the pyrrhic victory needs to be renamed…
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]

I remember reading as a kid that this is the kind of thing that an evil empire does. Now that I realize that evil empire is us, I don't understand how anyone can justify this horror show.

refurb 5y ago

I’m not sure I’d expect that enemy combatants could expect the same legal protections as someone who committed a crime in the US? I mean look at the Nuremberg trials. If there was ever an illusion of justice it was that trial. German citizens were convicted of “wars of aggression” against Poland while the USSR, who collaborated with the Nazis and committed war crimes against the Polish people, weren’t even on trial but rather judges.

quantum_solanum 5y ago
> enemy combatants this is literally the core fascist tautology that the article is critiquing, gotta love the uncritical regurgitation of it
- refurb 5y ago
  Read up on international laws of war and get back to me. The US didn’t make that term up.
  - quantum_solanum 5y ago
    you missed the point, which is that many of the people in Gitmo _were not_ "enemy combatants"
    - refurb 5y ago
      Sorry I wasn't able to determine that was your statement from your comment on "core fascist tautology" which sounds like internet warrior speak.

lazide 5y ago

1) it is a certain, very visible symbol of a certain type of approach to ‘terrorism’ that a large portion of the US population supports very strongly (do you remember all the comments for years about ‘glass parking lot’ re: the Middle East? I do.) 2) it opened a massive can of worms legally, and a huge mess related to what to do with detainees (some of which have now lost their original national citizenships and/or normal lives), as they are now basically wards of the US gov’t, with no existing legal framework to cover what to do. It wouldn’t surprise me if when it does get shutdown many of them end up being Refugees the US ends up supporting. Good luck explaining THAT to the voters. So it’s a big legal and PR mess that there is little incentive to try to fix for any politician. Lots of downside, little upside.

mirekrusin 5y ago

Evil empire is the one that lost.

hoseja 5y ago
Alternatively, "empire" is synonymous with "evil" because a benign entity cannot be competitive enough to reach empire size.
- kzrdude 5y ago
  I was pondering this when listening to stories of the fall of the Aztecs and the Inca empires (Fall of Civilizations podcast - some great hours-long stories there!). Officials from the Spanish empire came by and caused these meso- and south american empires to fall. The empires that fell were indeed already warmongering, and dominating their part of the continent due to fighting successful wars and/or alliances. In that sense, it was "only" an empire taking down another. That viewpoint is however just the politics of the history. We can't forget how it affected the people.
- mirekrusin 5y ago
  You mean ie. Empire State Building can be referred to as Evil State Building?
aqsalose 5y ago
So, did the US win in Afganistan?
- boomboomsubban 5y ago
  Our entire reason for invading Afghanistan was essentially to kill Bin Laden, so yes?
  - cannabis_sam 5y ago
    I mean, considering he was found in Pakistan, close to their security forces ( ostensibly allies of the US) while the US military was pumping literal trillions into trying to control the neighboring tribal country. All the while desperately (and until yesterday) denying the fact that the Saudis had anything to do with a terrorist attack concocted by a Saudi and executed by Saudis. I guess it’s a win, but in that case I think the entire concept of the pyrrhic victory needs to be renamed…

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]