3 ms·
This is spectacularly bad. Author rails against separating the modem, claiming iommu is sufficient (yeah, google qualcomm iommu cve, you'll find plenty of fun
by reuqwajhae 5y ago
This is spectacularly bad.
Author rails against separating the modem, claiming iommu is sufficient (yeah, google qualcomm iommu cve, you'll find plenty of fun to be had). Then goes on claiming that chips connected by usb 2.0 (a protocol explicitly used because it doesn't have rdma) might be vulnerable to some rdma attack.... because firewire exists?
They rail against being unable to swap out "the firmware", while failing to mention that "the firmware" in question is nothing more than the ddr4 memory training blob.