2 ms·

IMO, Texas is pretty nice minus the abortion law. * In cities, access to high quality, diverse food in stores and restaurants * No state income tax * Cheap l

IMO, Texas is pretty nice minus the abortion law. * In cities, access to high quality, diverse food in stores and restaurants * No state income tax * Cheap land outside cities. Fertile land in the Eastern half of the state * Plenty of jobs of all kinds * Decent schools * Mostly friendly people * Low overall cost of living * People are generally skeptical of the government (I count this as a perk) * Accommodates a lot of different lifestyles and perspectives, depending on where you choose to live

audit 5y ago
In my view -- it does not matter. A corporation should be able to economically punish any entity they choose (as long the punishment is within economic boundaries, and they have some sort of business/employment relation with that entity ) The stronger the message the better, why do it in small pieces. Why not stop doing business (eg Sales/support) in the state of TX. Whether it is a customer, an employee, a state or even a country. Corporations should be able to participate in political discourse when they want to and as long as they stay with the boundaries of economic punishment -- it should be celebrated. TX people love freedom, so freedom of corporations to punish economically -- should be one of those freedoms Perhaps some powerfull entities can economically retaliate, although I am not sure how. Salesforce is dominant in their industry and pretty powerful.