3 ms·
I don't miss groklaw, it was a heavily biased site whose whole analysis was dependent on only the accusations/defense of one side of the court cases and assumin
by belltaco 5y ago
I don't miss groklaw, it was a heavily biased site whose whole analysis was dependent on only the accusations/defense of one side of the court cases and assuming all of those were true and totally ignoring the other side, even if they had valid arguments. It slowly swallowed itself into its own black hole and went more and extreme, just like BoycottNovell/Techrights.
- BeefWellington 5y agoAre you thinking of another site? Groklaw, to my knowledge (and a quick check of various sources agrees) largely wound down after the SCO trial was done and dusted and was only temporarily handed over to another editor after the fact, finally shutting down in 2013. The site appears to still be up, if you have specifics you're thinking of you'd point at.
- belltaco 5y agoIt's Groklaw I am talking about. Initially they had decent coverage of the SCO case. But as time went on the analysis became too ideological and partisan. The analysis basically turned into covering all the documents filed by one side, and assuming that everything in them were all true, and not covering the defense arguments at all. I am too sleepy to look it up right now, but one case where I remember the abject partisanship was either about Corel or Word Perfect.