4 ms·
After the Pentagon was hit, I recall looking at early images of the wall supposedly struck by a Boing 757 (Fl 77) going hundreds of miles an hour. The size of t
by 8bitsrule 5y ago
After the Pentagon was hit, I recall looking at early images of the wall supposedly struck by a Boing 757 (Fl 77) going hundreds of miles an hour. The size of the hole didn't look jet-sized. There were no visible wing or engine marks on the nearby walls. No videos emerged to show what struck the wall or knocked down the light standards.
Physically, to this day, that whole scenario is confusing, and there's been little evidence to clarify it.
- boomboomsubban 5y agoImages of the wall came hours if not days later, at first basically all the coverage had was one nearby road camera moved to show smoke. There has been ample evidence of what happened. Though there is little video footage, only a few frames from low quality security cams, there are many pictures of the wreckage showing debris from a plane. At 10 AM on 9/11 it was unclear what happened. Now it's very clear.
- IAmGraydon 5y agoI really wish people would stop with this “no airplane parts” narrative. Do you know what happens to airplane parts when the hit a concrete wall at over 500 mph? You clearly don’t, so let me clarify: complete obliteration. They found parts of the airplane, but nothing big enough that you would recognized it as an airplane part unless you were an expert on the matter.