2 ms·
I don’t think this erodes roe v wade. I don’t think “choosing to abort your pregnancy specifically because it was a girl is bad” rises beyond social condemnatio
by lovich 5y ago
I don’t think this erodes roe v wade. I don’t think “choosing to abort your pregnancy specifically because it was a girl is bad” rises beyond social condemnation and needs to be legislated.
There seems to be some sort of unspoken belief among anti abortion proponents that roe v wade and pro choice beliefs are built on the flimsiest of legal arguments and if we even squint at it wrong the whole thing will come tumbling down.
> I’m not trying to incite anything here though.
>… then it would be an actual debate instead of a foregone conclusion for the left.
I find it hard to rectify those two statements in the same discussion much less the same comment
Edit: added the word “specifically” to the second sentence
- jimbob45 5y agoHow could you possibly legislate away such a thing though? Outside of a total ban? To my knowledge, not even the totalitarian government of China has successfully been able to legislate it away.
- lovich 5y agoI think you need to reread my comment. I specified that I don’t think this a something bad enough to need legislation. Social condemnation is enough