> Borland Pascal compilers that I mentioned had exactly the same memory models than their C++ counterparts, specially the Windows 3.1 versions, there was no dif

> Borland Pascal compilers that I mentioned had exactly the same memory models than their C++ counterparts, specially the Windows 3.1 versions, there was no difference between TPW 1.5 and TC++ 3.1. The Turbo C 1.0 User's Guide [1] page 244 (257) "Turbo C's Six Memory Models" lists these as tiny, small, medium, compact, large, huge. Also, page 220 (233) "The near, far, and huge Modifiers". You claim that these same capabilities were present in TP 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 and TPW 1.5. Can you provide a reference for that? [1] http://bitsavers.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/pdf/borland/turbo_c/Turbo_C_Users_Guide_1987.pdf http://bitsavers.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/pdf/borland/tur...