4 ms·
> it is a less than ideal solution but that cannot be illegal, right? First, we don’t know. The law is deliberately written in a vague and obtuse manner preci
by techsupporter 5y ago
> it is a less than ideal solution but that cannot be illegal, right?
First, we don’t know. The law is deliberately written in a vague and obtuse manner precisely to raise these kinds of questions so that everyone will avoid getting the procedure, except for those with the means and cover to not be harmed by the consequences of someone finding out. There’s an open question, for instance, if the driver of a cab taking someone to the airport to board a flight to a state to get an abortion would be deemed “aiding” the person.
Second, even if it isn’t, requiring someone to leave a state to exercise a right is generally considered not good under our federal system. All rights come with limits (exactly what limits are somewhat up for debate when it comes to any particular right) but, in general, current legal standing is that a person has the right to an abortion prior to the fetus’ viability. The states should not be attempting to restrict further than that.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- anshumankmr 5y agoI don't think they call really enforce that, right? Considering "state's rights" were a big point of contention in the South?
- rsynnott 5y agoRecall that a major driver of tension before the US civil war was slave states using federal law (Fugitive Slave Act) to force free states to enforce slavery. The whole ‘states rights’ thing was only when it suited.