3 ms·
the language of the law suggests that it's prohibited based on their political viewpoints versus isolating a specific political viewpoint. The recent events, w
by propogandist 5y ago
the language of the law suggests that it's prohibited based on their political viewpoints versus isolating a specific political viewpoint.
The recent events, where conservative voices were targeted by big tech, was the catalyst for the law, but that doesn't make it illegal.
- dragonwriter 5y ago> the language of the law suggests that it's prohibited based on their political viewpoints versus isolating a specific political viewpoint. You seem to be assuming a facially neutral law with a viewpoint specific purpose is Constitutional. It is not. Usually, its harder to prove an improper purpose for a facially-neutral law, but then usually the people passing and signing a law with an improper purpose don't just public announce the viewpoint they are seeking to advance.