4 ms·
In desktop, there is barely any difference now (Chrome's save as pdf feature is more accurate with tables). In mobile however, Chrome seems noticeably faster.
by aero-glide2 5y ago
In desktop, there is barely any difference now (Chrome's save as pdf feature is more accurate with tables).
In mobile however, Chrome seems noticeably faster.
- alserio 5y agoCounter point: install ublock origin on firefox mobile (which you cannot do on chrome) and the web is very noticeably faster on firefox.
- nsonha 5y agothis and "Video on background fix" which allows you to "listen" to youtube and multitask. I don't use the youtube app to avoid all the addictive features and tracking, and even it doesn't play in the background.
- stjohnswarts 5y agoNewpipe is great for youtube background listening.
- webmobdev 5y agoInstall the Youtube Vanced app - https://vancedapp.com/ https://vancedapp.com/
- nsonha 5y agoI know about this and New Pipe, but having tons of apps for every little thing I do on the phone is exactly what I avoid. All these apps do is supporting downloading and subscriptions, something I would care about if I submitted to the youtube time sink, which I do not. Besides, isn't this app a violation of Youtube's policies?
- aero-glide2 5y ago>isn't this app a violation of Youtube's policies? This is "hacker" news :)
- stjohnswarts 5y agoGraphics+javascript in firefox always feels a lot slower to me on firefox than on chrome (and chrome based browsers)