3 ms·
I agree that it will be controlled by them, whether or not it uses cryptographic algorithms. But also, I'm saying in either case, it amounts to the account tha
by perl4ever 5y ago
I agree that it will be controlled by them, whether or not it uses cryptographic algorithms.
But also, I'm saying in either case, it amounts to the account that each bank is required to have at the Fed, and the Fed apparently has refused in the past to go down the road of bypassing existing banks by opening this up to other entities or people.
You can view that cynically as regulatory capture, as a sinister banking cabal controlling everything, or as a prudently conservative outlook if you think the banking system serves a purpose, or might serve a purpose a la Chesterton's fence.
But no matter what the motivation, the question I have is why would they want to change their minds now?
- landemva 5y agoWhile it can be studied now, I suspect Congress will need the 1913 enabling law (which gave authority to private contracting company known as 'federal reserve') authority to directly hold consumer funds. It's not necessary as it can be done with existing consumer banking. Their idea is to remove bearer money - cash and coin. And then make barter more cumbersome.