2 ms·
I'm left here wondering which is true: has journalism as a field regressed, with loss of its original principles, or has it never been good to begin with. The
by esyir 5y ago
I'm left here wondering which is true: has journalism as a field regressed, with loss of its original principles, or has it never been good to begin with.
The professional journalists feel much less like the sources of information that they should be, and more like definers of "truth".
- wutbrodo 5y agoA lot of ills are laid at social media's door, but I think this is a warranted one. Journalists were/are the beating heart of Twitter's userbase, giving it outsize influence through years of a minuscule userbase (eg there was a non-trivial period where there were more active in-stream users of Google+ than Twitter). There have always been media personalities, but Twitter has made that the default mode of the industry, and removed editorial safeguards from a dramatic amount of the journalistic conversation. Less interestingly but probably more saliently, the economics destruction that the internet wrought on journalism has just destroyed the economic buffer that allowed them to build a culture of standards and principles (such as it was). People have always liked being affirmed over being informed, and the journalism market now forces journalists to deliver that.