You still can't read and still can't follow logic and show your bias for the Democratic party. And the Democratic Party is pro environment and isn't hypocritica

You still can't read and still can't follow logic and show your bias for the Democratic party. And the Democratic Party is pro environment and isn't hypocritical? > "Seem to be "pro-business", "small government" Republican states." Wait there are Democratic states that do the same. Both partial and total bans. So Democrats aren't hypocritical about being pro environment? > Total bans are worse than partial bans You said that C was not so bad. I said it wasn't knowable and therefore your statement shows your bias since it possible C >> L in the future. So you saying that partial bans is not as bad as total bans doesn't hold. There goes all your counts. In fact, we do know that one state already it has reached its limits. Go look at my guesstimate of Ford dealerships in NY. 200 vs the 5 limit. Have you considered the possibility that the existence of limits dissuades companies from expanding there first? Go look at Texas and Tesla complaining about the total ban. So a limit of 1 would be materially different from 0 when you expect 1 dealership per 20000 people in a state with almost 29 million people? Is NY fine? NY 5 dealerships, population 19.75 million Is Ohio fine? OH 3 dealerships, population 11.74 million Is Pennsylvania fine? PA 5 dealerships, population 13 million No limit: MA 5 dealerships, population 6.794 million So you should expect between 14 and 15 for NY. Too bad Tesla is growing at 50%. So that will be 22 this year. For Ohio, roughly 8 instead of 3. Is that ok? How about with 50% growth? That would be 12. Same with Pennsylvania. Even your numbers make it look pretty bad. Can you hear yourself? They do it. But you do it too. But they are worse. Your emperor has no clothes.