3 ms·
It doesn't matter who the policy works for. The point is, it's a social network. Owned by Google. Who cares if you don't like their TOS? Vote with your feet, d
by walexander 15y ago
It doesn't matter who the policy works for.
The point is, it's a social network. Owned by Google. Who cares if you don't like their TOS? Vote with your feet, don't make ridiculous claims like they're abusing power and oppressing minorities.
- sid0 15y agoWho cares if you don't like their TOS? That is an unsatisfying way to look at it. I think a better way to look at it is "it's public knowledge, therefore the public has the freedom to complain about it and hope that Google will listen."
- walexander 15y agoAnd that's fine. That's essentially the point I was making. No one forces you to sign up for Google+. If you complain about the lack of anonymity and refuse to sign up, maybe Google will budge. It will cost them to block pseudonyms and I'm sure they'll weigh those costs. What's ridiculous is acting like this is somehow a breach of human rights.