3 ms·
The crux is that one needs to be willing to pierce through the pretend veil of separation: > “the correct outcome from a compliance perspective” and could plac
by heisenbit 5y ago
The crux is that one needs to be willing to pierce through the pretend veil of separation:
> “the correct outcome from a compliance perspective” and could place the staffing companies it contracts with “in a difficult position, legally and ethically”.
The systemic abuse of subcontracting companies to undermine the rule of law by these large corporations needs to stop. But it only will if executives at Google would face the same consequences as executives at the subcontractors (which tend to escape criminal punishments as well by hiding behind multiple shells and false ids).
- Consultant32452 5y agoThe systemic abuse from the rule of law needs to stop. How dare anyone try to tell me who I can work for or how much I can charge for my services. All this nonsense does is keep the privileged in their place by not allowing the poor to underbid them.
- nickff 5y agoThe minimum wage was one of the earliest examples of this; attempting to make it more expensive (and uneconomical) to employ black people.
- Consultant32452 5y agoI think I'm going to start using reverse psychology on these issues. "I love these laws. I don't want the poors undercutting me. They should be deported instead."
- ravel-bar-foo 5y agoIn Korea subcontractors with limited liability for workplace accidents was a huge problem in construction. The law now holds contractors and subcontractors equally liable for workplace safety violations.