3 ms·
This sounds like your internal biases are coming into play. If we reversed your statement to "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for black
by hundreder 5y ago
This sounds like your internal biases are coming into play.
If we reversed your statement to "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for black children.", a reasonable reader would assume the speaker thought said group was being persecuted, not that they desired supremacy.
Its entirely reasonable for someone who holds that belief to be concerned about racial persecution without the desire for racial supremacy.
- amazingman 5y agoThis is what makes the thirteen words such effective radicalizing propaganda in the current moment. Neither articulation is reasonable, both are vaguely supremacist and overtly racialist.
- bsanr2 5y ago>a reasonable reader would assume the speaker thought said group was being persecuted That's only reasonable because of a common understanding that black people have been persecuted because of their race. No such reasonable, common understanding exists for white people in America; it is at best an unreasonable and niche understanding espoused by people who believe they're being persecuted by Jews and Asians (whether "Tiger Family" or "H1-B”).