3 ms·
> Good collaborative travel software needs voting. It needs a way for teams of people to make wishlists and then helps determine which will work out the best.
by jperras 5y ago
> Good collaborative travel software needs voting. It needs a way for teams of people to make wishlists and then helps determine which will work out the best.
A few years ago we built this exact thing for an airline that you have definitely heard of. I believe it ended up being shelved due to internal politics/shuffling, but it encompassed everything that you described except non-travel/lodging scheduling.
The problem with these kinds of systems is that you always end up having to declare one person the de facto dictator/organizer (which effectively mimics reality), and the whole experience is perhaps overkill for groups of less than 6 people who would likely just conduct the informal planning over an SMS group chat.
- basch 5y agoI dont think group tinder for restaurants is that complex, from the UX side. I dont see why there has to be a leader. Why cant it be a wikipedia style, "anybody can edit anything"? Or the option to have admins and just voting participants? If there must be a leader, why cant the AI be the leader? Or if nothing else, why isnt it just a pretty interface for tallying votes. "Oh, it seems going to a football game is way more popular of an idea than any of us expected." It should also take into account events happening that overlap the trip. If I am there week A maybe football games are an option, but if we are there week B maybe its a country concert. Is there any good local event planning for groups software? It could be as simple as "What showtime works for everyone, where are we eating, do I need to bring anything." Structured conversation, that learns over time.