>The decision concludes the first part of the battle between the two companies over Apple’s App Store policies and whether they stifle competition. Apple won on

>The decision concludes the first part of the battle between the two companies over Apple’s App Store policies and whether they stifle competition. Apple won on 9 of 10 counts but will be forced to change its App Store policies and loosen its grip over in-app purchases. >Rogers said that Apple was not a monopolist and “success is not illegal.” >“Given the trial record, the Court cannot ultimately conclude that Apple is a monopolist under either federal or state antitrust laws,” Rogers wrote. Glad to see nobody knows what a monopoly is anymore. It's like the Grant administration all over again...