3 ms·
Dodging the question would be a non-ruling. The judge issued an injunction. It's in the title of the post.
by cush 5y ago
Dodging the question would be a non-ruling. The judge issued an injunction. It's in the title of the post.
- bialpio 5y agoI seem to recall reporting around some Supreme Court ruling that was phrased as "there is a ruling but the question is still undecided". It may have been Google v. Oracle, where it didn't say APIs are copyrightable or not, but Google's use fell under fair use irrespective of that. So just the existence of a ruling doesn't mean there is an answer to the question that was asked.
- gpm 5y agoThe judge issued a injunction based on another law that didn't require Apple be a monopoly, found that the record did not prove that Apple was a monopoly (and thus against Epic on that theory), but took the time to clarify that Apple might be a monopoly, it just wasn't proved.