3 ms·
No I’m simply rejecting your framing of the discussion. Rights are not a question of votes. It is not up for deciding democratically. To frame the question this
by disneygibson 5y ago
No I’m simply rejecting your framing of the discussion. Rights are not a question of votes. It is not up for deciding democratically. To frame the question this way is to fundamentally misunderstand how rights work.
- ImPostingOnHN 5y agoyour framing is that anything you say is a right/violation/infringement is one that framing does not reflect reality if and when a SCOTUS ruling says that this specific mandate is a violation of constitutional rights, you will be correct until then, you are not correct, by default otherwise any random dude on the internet could just declare _anything_ a "right" and declare _anything_ an "infringement" I still respect you as a person, though -- have a great day
- disneygibson 5y agoIt has nothing to do with SCOTUS specifically. I can’t keep repeating the same thing over and over again.
- ImPostingOnHN 5y agoit does -- SCOTUS is the one who will decide whether or not you are correct when claiming this move is a violation or an infringement on constitutional rights I can't keep repeating the same thing over and over again