Like many (but not all) GOP actions lately, this appears to be entirely symbolic -- a way to show their base that they're "doing things," even if those things w

Like many (but not all) GOP actions lately, this appears to be entirely symbolic -- a way to show their base that they're "doing things," even if those things will be immediately struck down as blatantly violating the First Amendment. As the article says: > "The rule’s future, however, is uncertain. It’s likely to face legal challenges from critics, and unlike the recent Texas abortion ban, it’s not tailored to evade judicial scrutiny. A judge blocked Florida’s social media law in June, saying it 'compels providers to host speech that violates their standards.'"