4 ms·
I think the implication is that his children would also have to use their real names (but I don't know how the bill actually deals with minors).
by exogen 15y ago
I think the implication is that his children would also have to use their real names (but I don't know how the bill actually deals with minors).
- tlb 15y agoSo is there evidence that children are at a higher risk of being kidnapped (or some other bad thing) if their info is public? There was some tabloid scaremongering to this effect in the early days of the Internet, but there are now enough kids online that there should be enough data to confirm or refute this myth.