4 ms·
The 61% is misleading because it includes children ineligible for the vaccine. My undertow that they’ve vaccinated something like 80% of adults (one of the high
by jtc331 5y ago
The 61% is misleading because it includes children ineligible for the vaccine. My undertow that they’ve vaccinated something like 80% of adults (one of the highest on the world).
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- ImPostingOnHN 5y ago80% of adults is misleading because it excludes children who can still get the virus and spread it to others tbh the concept of herd immunity doesn't care about who the law says can get vaccinated
- angelzen 5y agoAn unvaccinated child has less chance of severe covid compared to a vaccinated adult. Covid is different between child and adults, reasonable to hypothesize that transmission is also different. > Evidence from studies primarily done before vaccine approval for those 12 years of age and older suggests that staff-to-staff transmission is more common than transmission from students to staff, staff to student, or student to student. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/transmission_k_12_schools.html#sars-cov-2 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-br...
- ImPostingOnHN 5y ago"less chance of severe covid compared to a vaccinated adult" is an attempt to move the goalposts to an irrelevant point if they're vaccinated, they count towards the numerator if they are a person, and thus have a nonzero chance of getting infected, and a nonzero chance of infecting others if infected, they count towards the denominator that's how you determine vaccination rate