> absence of symptoms is not a sufficient indicator for a vaccinated person Absence of symptoms is not a sufficient indicator for the unvaxed either, so your a

> absence of symptoms is not a sufficient indicator for a vaccinated person Absence of symptoms is not a sufficient indicator for the unvaxed either, so your argument falls apart. Why isn't 90% reduction in ICU occupation and 70% reduction in chance of infection a sufficient argument for the public benefits? Just because it is not perfect, you'd rather let the country's hospitals overload and shut down?