3 ms·
I rather thing the big players are ignoring security risks on purpose. Eg Amazon AWS just switched from their secure and isolated Xen to the insecure and faster
by rurban 5y ago
I rather thing the big players are ignoring security risks on purpose. Eg Amazon AWS just switched from their secure and isolated Xen to the insecure and faster KVM.
Everybody is praising the insecure eBPF on servers. You can certainly play with eBPF on your private isolated machines, but on big public servers it's a high risk. Still, there is where it's used.
Nobody but java cares about Unicode identifier insecurity. It's just shrug off, even if the standard gives explicit recommendations and guidelines.
Insecurity is the default until a desaster destroys the business model. Managers are making those decisions mostly.