4 ms·

Yes, because the policy works for you, it should therefore work for everyone. Also, according to you, a policy which prevents compromising a system is exactly

• walexander 15y ago
  It doesn't matter who the policy works for. The point is, it's a social network. Owned by Google. Who cares if you don't like their TOS? Vote with your feet, don't make ridiculous claims like they're abusing power and oppressing minorities.
  • sid0 15y ago
    Who cares if you don't like their TOS? That is an unsatisfying way to look at it. I think a better way to look at it is "it's public knowledge, therefore the public has the freedom to complain about it and hope that Google will listen."
    • walexander 15y ago
      And that's fine. That's essentially the point I was making. No one forces you to sign up for Google+. If you complain about the lack of anonymity and refuse to sign up, maybe Google will budge. It will cost them to block pseudonyms and I'm sure they'll weigh those costs. What's ridiculous is acting like this is somehow a breach of human rights.
• tomica 15y ago
  forcing people? who the actual f-- is forcing anyone to use g+? you would have far better luck arguing that you are forced to use your real name on facebook (as it seems "everyone is on facebook", and thus "you must be also" is a valid sentiment), but even there it's a biiig stretch.. and i don't ever remember the controversy of real names on facebook..