> Note that I'm using the commonly recognized "generic type" angle bracket notation to deliberately avoid the confusion of Haskell's pedantically minimalist syn

> Note that I'm using the commonly recognized "generic type" angle bracket notation to deliberately avoid the confusion of Haskell's pedantically minimalist syntax. I really appreciate this. I know the Haskell syntax kindasorta, but my brain just doesn't grok it well. Vs anything along the lines of Generic[Type] or Generic<Type> is just far more familiar for most audiences, myself included. The people whom Haskell type syntax makes sense for are largely not the ones trying to learn this stuff.